Executive Summary
This Business Continuity Plan (BCP) outlines strategies to ensure the CIA Compliance Manager application and its data remain available during disruptions while maintaining the confidentiality and integrity of security assessments. The plan aligns with the application's core focus on the CIA triad (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability).
Related Architecture Documentation
🏛️ Current Architecture
Reference architecture and system components for the current implementation.
View Architecture🔄 Process Flowcharts
Critical business processes and workflows for the CIA Compliance Manager.
View Flowcharts⚙️ CI/CD Workflows
Deployment and automation processes that support business continuity.
View Workflows🔮 Future Architecture
Planned architectural evolution that will enhance resilience and continuity.
View Future VisionBusiness Impact Analysis
Critical Functions
Function | Description | Maximum Tolerable Downtime | Recovery Priority |
---|---|---|---|
Security Assessment Engine | Core assessment calculations and algorithms | 4 hours | Very High |
User Authentication | Identity verification and access control | 2 hours | Critical |
Security Dashboard | Primary interface for security monitoring | 8 hours | High |
Compliance Mapping | Framework requirements mapping | 24 hours | Medium |
Reporting & Export | Report generation and data export | 12 hours | High |
User Data & Settings | User configurations and saved assessments | 8 hours | High |
Impact Categories
Financial Impact
- Minimal direct revenue impact as a free/open-source tool
- Organizations may seek alternative solutions if unavailable for >24 hours
- Extended outages require additional support and recovery resources
Operational Impact
- Organizations depend on the tool for security planning
- Disruptions may delay regulatory compliance activities
- Technical teams rely on implementation guidance
Regulatory and Compliance Impact
- Organizations need continuous access to maintain compliance posture
- Historical assessment data serves as compliance evidence
- Tool outputs are used during security audits
Recovery Strategies
Data Backup and Recovery
Data Type | Backup Frequency | Retention Period | Storage Location |
---|---|---|---|
User Assessments | Continuous | 90 days | Primary and redundant storage |
User Settings | On change | 90 days | Primary and redundant storage |
Application Code | On commit | Indefinite | GitHub + redundant repositories |
Static Content | On release | Current + previous 3 versions | CDN with fallback |
Technical Recovery Procedures
Infrastructure Recovery
- Deploy from infrastructure-as-code templates
- Activate standby environment if primary is unavailable
- Restore from latest verified backup snapshots
Application Recovery
- Deploy latest stable release from redundant code repositories
- Verify application health via automated test suite
- Validate core functionality through predefined recovery checks
Data Recovery
- Restore user data from most recent verified backup
- Verify data integrity through validation procedures
- Implement data reconciliation for any lost transactions
Communication Plan
Stakeholder | Communication Method | Timing | Responsibility |
---|---|---|---|
End Users | Status Page, GitHub Issues | Within 30 minutes of incident | Project Maintainer |
Contributors | Direct notification, Slack | Within 15 minutes of incident | Project Lead |
Hosting Providers | Support channels | Immediately | Infrastructure Lead |
Regulatory Bodies | Email (if applicable) | Within 24 hours (if applicable) | Compliance Lead |
Security Considerations
Data Protection During Recovery
Encryption
All backup data remains encrypted at rest and in transit
Access Control
Recovery procedures require multi-factor authentication
Integrity Verification
Cryptographic verification of all restored data
Audit Logs
Comprehensive logging of all recovery actions
Security Controls Mapping
Recovery Activity | Security Control | Compliance Framework |
---|---|---|
Data Backup | CP-9 System Backup | NIST 800-53, ISO 27001 (A.12.3.1) |
System Recovery | CP-10 System Recovery and Reconstitution | NIST 800-53, ISO 27001 (A.17.1.2) |
Alternate Storage | CP-6 Alternate Storage Site | NIST 800-53, ISO 27001 (A.17.2.1) |
Testing | CP-4 Contingency Plan Testing | NIST 800-53, ISO 27001 (A.17.1.3) |
Recovery Objectives
Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs)
Component | Basic Level | Standard Level | Enhanced Level |
---|---|---|---|
Web Application | < 24 hours | < 8 hours | < 2 hours |
API Services | < 12 hours | < 4 hours | < 1 hour |
Authentication | < 6 hours | < 2 hours | < 30 minutes |
Database | < 12 hours | < 4 hours | < 1 hour |
Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs)
Component | Basic Level | Standard Level | Enhanced Level |
---|---|---|---|
User Assessments | < 24 hours | < 4 hours | < 15 minutes |
Configuration Data | < 24 hours | < 4 hours | < 15 minutes |
User Settings | < 24 hours | < 4 hours | < 15 minutes |
Architectural Resilience Strategy
The CIA Compliance Manager employs a layered resilience approach that aligns with its core function of assessing CIA controls:
Confidentiality Layer
Principle: Maintain data confidentiality even during recovery scenarios
Implementation: Encryption at rest and in transit for all backup data
Verification: Access control validation before recovery processes
Integrity Layer
Principle: Ensure data accuracy and consistency through recovery
Implementation: Cryptographic verification of backup integrity
Verification: Post-recovery data validation procedures
Availability Layer
Principle: Minimize downtime through redundant systems
Implementation: Distributed deployment architecture
Verification: Regular failover testing and recovery drills
Testing and Exercises
Exercise Type | Frequency | Participants | Success Criteria |
---|---|---|---|
Tabletop Exercise | Quarterly | Core maintainers | Complete walkthrough of recovery steps |
Technical Recovery Test | Semi-annually | DevOps team | Successful restoration in test environment |
Full Recovery Simulation | Annually | All key stakeholders | Complete recovery within defined RTO |
Business Continuity Maturity Roadmap
Current State
- Basic backup and recovery procedures
- Manual recovery processes
- Limited redundancy
Near-Term Improvements (0-6 months)
- Automate backup verification
- Implement recovery readiness monitoring
- Create detailed recovery runbooks
Mid-Term Strategy (6-12 months)
- Deploy active/passive redundancy
- Implement automated recovery testing
- Establish recovery metrics dashboard
Long-Term Vision (12+ months)
- Active/active deployment architecture
- Self-healing infrastructure components
- Real-time recovery capability monitoring
Plan Maintenance
This business continuity plan should be reviewed and updated:
- After any significant architectural change
- Following any recovery event (incorporating lessons learned)
- At least every six months
- When new critical functionality is added